FIA Formula One World Championship
Sunday, 3 November 2013
2014 F1 Calendar Update
Monday, 30 September 2013
22 Races of 2014 F1 Calendar
Tuesday, 10 September 2013
Bahrain tipped to be night race in 2014?
Thursday, 5 September 2013
Mexico In and New Jersey Out - 2014 Formula One Provisional Calendar
March 16 - Australia (Melbourne) March 23 - Malaysia (Sepang) April 6 - China (Shanghai) April 13 – Korea* (Korea International Circuit) April 27 – Bahrain (Sakhir) May 11 – Spain (Barcelona) May 25 – Monaco (Monaco) June 8 – Canada (Montreal) June 22 – Austria (Red Bull Ring) July 6 – Britain (Silverstone) July 20 – Germany (Hockenheim) July 27 – Hungary (Budapest) August 24 – Belgium (Spa) September 7 – Italy (Monza) September 21 – Singapore (Marina Bay) October 5 - Japan (Suzuka) October 19 – Russia* (Sochi) October 26 – Abu Dhabi (Yas Marina) November 9 – Mexico* (Mexico City) November 16 – USA (Circuit of the Americas) November 30 – Brazil (Interlagos)
* (subject to confirmation of track/contract)
Tuesday, 27 August 2013
2014 F1 Calendar speculation
The roar was drowned out by the incessant chattering over the 2014 provisional calendar.
The calendar speculation has been intense this summer, with all sorts of changes afoot. The first story was that India would be moving to the spring, where it would be back-to-back with China. And it will be held in 2015. Both Melbourne and Bahrain are in line to kick off proceedings in 2014.
What was interesting about the speculation taking place in Spa is that much of it differed depending on the nationality of the gossip in question. I have long been expecting Mexico to return to the calendar, but while the Europeans have been looking to 2015 - pointing to all the work needed to bring the Autódromo Hermanos Rodríguez back up to F1-spec - the Latin American media are talking seriously about 2014. Charlie Whiting, the FIA's race director and safety delegate, is due to visit Mexico in the coming weeks to inspect the circuit, and if the race organisers are able to complete the necessary work in time, Mexico could appear on the calendar as early as next year. The aim is to run the race back-to-back with Austin, giving the F1 circus a week off in the Americas before traipsing down to Interlagos for the season finale.
Austria's return to the calendar - with a provisional date of 6 July, no less - is looking more and more like a replacement for the German Grand Prix, and not an additional European event. But even that much-heralded event has its own issues, thanks to crowd capacity restrictions of 40,000, lower even that the 60,000 widely reported elsewhere. Exceptions can be applied for, but there is a lot of red tape to wade through. Speaking of red tape, Formula One looks likely to trade one behemoth of bureaucracy for another, with the Russian Grand Prix at Sochi set to claim India's late-October date. Or thereabouts, anyway – should Mexico join the calendar in 2014 there will be a lot of shuffling of dates in the final round of flyaways.
And then there's New Jersey to consider. The weekend's reports that the race was off have been denied by F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone, who said the race would go ahead as long as the organisers complied with the terms of their contract. But the NJ race will complicate the summer somewhat. Monaco is generally fixed as the last weekend in May, and the WMSC have blocked out the weekend of 14 June for Le Mans. If Austria takes place on 6 July as scheduled, that leaves Montreal, New Jersey, and Silverstone all looking for a June slot.
Michelin could be face of F1 tyre supplier in 2014
There is increased speculation that Michelin could return to Formula One next season after was interested in supplying the sport for next year.
Formula One does not currently have its tyre supply for 2014 confirmed, although Pirelli is known to have commercial contracts in place with all but one team. It's a point Ecclestone too has acknowledged, making any change in supplier difficult. Michelin is said to have told teams over the Monaco Grand Prix weekend that it was not interested in supplying Formula One next season.
It has also been reported that should Michelin enter F1 it would want to move away from the current 13-inch wheels to 18-inch wheels for 2016, and does not want to produce the type of fast-wearing rubber Formula One has had for the last three seasons. Pirelli Motorsport Director Paul Hembery has made his position on the current situation clear, believing it would be farcical to begin a tender process now. "If you wanted to do that then it should have been done in September of last year," Hembery said at the weekend. "Everybody will look ridiculous in that scenario."
Pirelli is in a strong position as any change in tyre supply must come via a tender process. Following the Spanish Grand Prix Mercedes performed unauthorised tyre testing for Pirelli. It resulted in both appearing before an FIA International Tribunal which ruled that while the test was not in keeping with the rules (and banned Mercedes from the subsequent Young Driver Test at Silverstone). Pirelli cannot therefore be excluded from any tender process or deemed unfit for supply, thereby closing one door on the FIA's alleged desire to switch to Michelin.
Much of that however has been for reasons out of its control with the teams themselves complicit in many of the failures seen so far in 2013.
Had teams followed Pirelli's advice it is likely we would not have seen the same concern surrounding tyres. Perhaps Paul Hembery and his team is naïve to expect Formula One teams to follow advice and recommendations rather than looking for greater performance, but the line has to be drawn somewhere and ultimately it is Pirelli which has suffered for the teams' unwillingness to listen. There are now regulations in place to ensure they do, and changes to the tyres have not seen a repeat of the Silverstone fiasco where a number of tyres failed.
There remains a general feeling within the paddock that the tyres are too susceptible to 'debris' on the circuit, with Mark Webber wanting a better explanation. "We need answers, and 'debris' is not the answer," Webber argued on Friday.
For Michelin to win a tender process over Pirelli it would have to very clearly demonstrate that it is the best possible supplier for Formula One. The French company must prove it can produce tyres to an incredibly tight deadline and provide an attractive financial package to teams who currently pay Pirelli in the region of £2.6million a year.
Monday, 26 August 2013
Mexico set to return in 2014 says Ecclestone
Formula One boss Bernie Ecclestone has revealed that a decision is due “within a couple of weeks” about whether the Mexican Grand Prix will take place next year.
The race would fill a void in the F1 calendar which has been left by the exit of several races, including the planned Grand Prix of America in New Jersey which Ecclestone has said will not go ahead in 2014 because the organizers have not raised enough money to fund it. The 2014 calendar will be finalized in December by F1's governing body, the FIA, but new races need financing in place by now to ensure their plans are on track. “I should know within a couple of weeks about Mexico,” Ecclestone told Autoweek, adding “I'm going to try to make it happen.”
The Grand Prix is due to be held at Mexico City's Autódromo Hermanos Rodriguez, which last hosted an F1 race in 1992. The plan to revive the Mexican Grand Prix has the backing of an all-star management team which is driven by two key figures. The first is Tavo Hellmund, the creator and mastermind of the F1 USGP and the Circuit of the Americas in Austin, Texas. His counterpart in Mexico is Alejandro Soberon, chief executive of the world's third-largest live entertainment company, CIE. The team members include Carlos Slim Domit, who sits on the FIA's decision-making body, the Senate, and is son of the world's richest man, Carlos Slim.
The Mexican Grand Prix is understood to be fully funded but, according to Ecclestone, the same cannot be said of the Grand Prix of America in New Jersey. Its organizers appointed investment bank UBS in June to raise $100 million which is required for the race to go ahead. It seems they have run out of time. "It's not on the cards for next year,” said Ecclestone, adding that the problem is “they haven't got any money.”
The race was planned to be run on 3.2 miles of public roads in Port Imperial, a district in the New Jersey towns of West New York and Weehawken. It snakes alongside the Hudson river and would give the race a spectacular backdrop of Manhattan's historic skyline.
It was originally set for June this year but was postponed after the organizers missed payment deadlines in their contract with the F1 Group. Ecclestone said he signed the deal despite the funding not being in place because he understood the organizers would be able to raise it. The promoter is Leo Hindery Jr., a sometime racer and managing partner of private equity fund InterMedia Partners. “The guy is a multibillionaire and is well-known in New York,” said Ecclestone.
In 2011 Hindery provided the initial $10.3 million investment in race organizing company Port Imperial Racing Associates (PIRA) and obtained an additional $10.1 million loan. In April this year, the F1 Group itself provided the company with a credit facility personally guaranteed by Hindery, but the Grand Prix still needs $100 million to get the green light. It isn't the only race that has hit a roadblock.
Last month it was announced that the Indian Grand Prix will skip 2014 but this was balanced out by the news that the Austrian Grand Prix will return to the calendar after an 11-year hiatus. It would keep the number of races stable at 19 in 2014 if it wasn't for the addition of the Russian Grand Prix in Sochi.
F1's contracts with the teams stipulate that majority consent from Ferrari, McLaren and Red Bull Racing is required if there are more than 20 races in a season. If Mexico joins but the brakes stay on New Jersey, it seems there would be 21 races in 2014. However, there have been widespread reports that the loss-making Korean Grand Prix may be dropped next year which means that Mexico would take the total just to the limit of 20. Ecclestone couldn't have planned it much better.